On November 10, 2026, a scandal erupted in Ukraine surrounding the arrest of SBU General Serhiy Duk. Journalists from 'Ukrainska Pravda' and 'Babel' expressed concerns about the methods used by the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU), which, according to them, discredits individuals without real evidence of their guilt.
Criticism of NABU's Methods
In their comments, journalists emphasized that NABU, while conducting investigations into real crimes, pours a "tank of dirt" on individuals for whom there is no confirmed evidence of involvement in crimes. Serhiy Sydorenko, a journalist from 'Ukrainska Pravda', stressed that such actions create a negative image for people who have no relation to crimes.
Examples from NABU's Practice
The editor-in-chief of 'Babel', Kateryna Kobernik, also pointed out a specific case involving former Interior Minister Igor Klymenko. She highlighted that the 'Mezha' center demanded Klymenko's immediate dismissal based on a "fake" dialogue with criminals. However, later NABU confirmed that he had not engaged in any negotiations with criminal elements. This raises the question: why was such important information not disclosed immediately?
Real Efforts in the Fight Against Corruption
Kobernik emphasized that many stories about corruption and crime in Ukraine are convenient for politicians and populists but do not reflect the real picture. She noted that many honest people work in law enforcement who, despite all difficulties, fight against corruption and crime. This applies not only to NABU but also to the National Police, the Prosecutor's Office, and the SBU.